Yeah exactly, and welcome!
It stands for Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt.
I’ll be honest, though, I only really ever see it used in borderline cult-like environments, like cryptocurrency or Star Citizen. It’s a very weird term to use IMO
How was the Jack in the Box thing FUD?
Someone else looked to the group claiming responsibility for this. It’s a pro-Palestinian Russian group
It’s a turn of phrase lol
LLMs are great for things that don’t have to be tied to facts and the real world. I’ve used it for parody songs or for brainstorming character ideas.
Are there any major languages that actually struggle to be typed today?
Just fine is pushing it, we are capable but not particularly good.
We need specific plant parts grown on purpose to be consumable (fruit, nuts, …), or we need cooking.
And what wild animals can we eat raw and uncooked better than plants?
So our population has increased by 50% and you expect our energy demands to stay the same or decrease? All countries have increased energy production, including China, I’m not sure why you’re making this sound like a US centric problem.
Humans aren’t carnivores, we’re omnivores and we can digest plants just fine
You weren’t talking about wealth, you said that our energy consumption continued to rise.
It’s almost like our population has continued to increase for the last 30 years
Did I misremember something, or is my memory easily influenced by external stimuli? No, the Mandela Effect must be real!
/s
What’s so appalling about this?
I’m sorry, I took your ending question as a challenge towards the victimization of women, not as an attempt to get the other commenter to think about how men are treated differently.
My bad, I 100% agree with you.
Why don’t we see the same language used on victimised men?
Are men victimized systemically and threatened physically to the same extent women are? Feminists speaking up for women’s issues doesn’t preclude men from speaking up for men’s issues, but lo and behold, men don’t have the same issues as a population that women do, and it’s not feminists’ job to speak up for them anyway.
Edit: I misunderstood, see reply.
Gotcha, so advocating for the same solution as AES countries do is bad, good to know.
Doesn’t China advocate for a two state solution too? Even they aren’t arguing for Israel to not exist.
Splitting Chrome from Google wouldn’t make Chrome not a monopoly, though, right?