exactly whose point of view was watching this dude? the only other person is the mom who is watching a show.

that still doesn’t make sense. no one in the scene is watching this guy so NOT POV.

I’m not sure what’s worse. the fact you can understand the incoherence or that you believed any of it.

personally I think it’s the phone that’s more the problem. the persistent access seems like it contributes more to habit forming than the nebulous definition of social media. and that’s much easier to define and possible enforce.

found the smoker

I don’t think internet is as much the problem as phones.

found the scourge

that was just, like, their opinion, man

regardless of a child’s inherent language skills I would argue that it’s a detriment to baby talk to them. surely the earlier they receive regular communication the sooner they are going to learn it.

I will never not cringe at “on accident” instead of “by accident”

euchhhh.

same as my GameStop shares

easier than typing out a long string

We hate that we have to POLITICALLY ALIGN with you.

Also it’s “ad” not “add”.

mansplained like a true splain

really? you’re supposed to know it’s not Minnesota. SUCH AS AMERICANS.

but I guess you grokked the comment like an average American so there’s that.

welcome, but maybe consider not using the world instance. it is pretty saturated and the point is to spread users out across many instances instead of having one monolithic one

useless nobody

thanks. perfect.

that’s THE joke. what other possible interpretation is there?